Category: Uncategorized

  • Are Free VPNs Safe? The Real Dangers Explained

    Learn

    Are free VPNs safe, or should you avoid them?

    MCThe MiisterSoftware team Updated July 16, 2026 9 min read

    A free VPN looks like a great deal, except running a global server fleet is expensive, and nobody offers it out of charity. So who pays? Most of the time it is you, with your browsing data resold, ads injected, sometimes malware bundled in. Here are the real dangers of a free VPN in 2026, the apps to avoid, what independent studies actually found, and the very few genuinely trustworthy exceptions.

    “Data for free access” model ~1 in 5 apps flagged risky Frequent DNS and IP leaks A few free tiers are trustworthy
    Cover image (WEBP, SEO alt text “dangers of a free VPN”)

    TL;DR, the essentials

    • Most “100% free” VPNs fund themselves by collecting and reselling your data, or by injecting ads and trackers. You are the product.
    • The risk is not theoretical: independent analyses have found malware, data leaks and missing encryption across a large share of the free apps tested.
    • A handful of serious exceptions exist (free tiers from reputable paid providers), but you can count them on one hand.

    “Why pay for a VPN when free ones exist?” It is a fair question, but it misses one key point: a free VPN is not cost-free, it is simply paid for another way. And that “other way” sometimes turns directly against the very privacy you were trying to protect. Let’s break down the dangers of a free VPN, with facts and figures rather than slogans.

    Why is a free VPN never really free?

    Running a VPN takes servers around the world, bandwidth, security teams and audits. That adds up to millions per year. A provider giving you all of that for nothing has to make money somewhere. In practice, three business models fund free VPNs.

    1

    Reselling your data

    The most common model among fake free VPNs. The app collects your browsing history, IP address, device details, sometimes downloaded files, then sells that information to data brokers and ad networks. Deeply ironic for a tool meant to protect your privacy.

    2

    Ads and trackers

    Others inject banners, pop-ups, even trackers straight into your traffic. Every ad shown and every advertising profile sold generates revenue, at your expense and often without informed consent.

    3

    Honest freemium

    The only healthy model: a paid provider offers a limited free version (capped data or servers) to nudge you toward the paid plan. Here it is the paying subscriber who funds the free tier, not your data. That is the case with Proton VPN and Windscribe.

    The rule to remember

    If you are not paying for the product, chances are you are the product. A credible free tier clearly has a paid plan behind it, and that plan is what funds the free version.

    What are the real dangers of a free VPN?

    Beyond the business model, here is what can actually go wrong when you install a shady free VPN.

    1

    Collecting and reselling your data

    The number one danger. Your browsing habits, resold to third parties, feed precise ad profiling. The VPN becomes a tracker instead of a shield.

    2

    Malware and booby-trapped apps

    Some free apps bundle malicious software, trojans or intrusive scripts. On mobile it is a very common infection vector, all the more so because users freely grant broad permissions to a “security tool.”

    3

    Data leaks (DNS, IP, WebRTC)

    Many free VPNs are poorly configured and leak your real IP address or DNS queries outside the tunnel. You think you are protected, yet your true identity stays visible. To understand this, see our guide on DNS leaks in the VPN hub.

    4

    Weak or missing encryption

    The worst case: an app that promises to “protect your traffic” without actually encrypting it. Analyses have found hundreds of free apps applying no real encryption, or obsolete, breakable protocols.

    5

    Intrusive ads and browser hijacking

    Repeated pop-ups, redirects to sketchy pages, a changed default search engine: beyond the annoyance, this behavior exposes you to phishing and scams.

    6

    Your device turned into a relay

    The most serious case. Some free VPNs use their users’ connections as exit nodes for other people. In other words, unknown, potentially illegal traffic can leave from your IP address without your knowledge.

    Want a VPN you can actually trust?

    Our comparison ranks the best VPNs of 2026 on encryption, audited logging policy and speed.

    See the comparison →

    Which free VPNs should you avoid entirely?

    In the interest of honesty, these cases have been documented by security researchers and specialist media over the years. Some apps may have fixed specific issues since, but they are still routinely cited as examples of bad practice.

    Hola VPNUsed its users’ connections as exit nodes for others, exposing their IP to third-party traffic.Avoid
    SuperVPNFlagged for malicious code, despite tens of millions of downloads.Avoid
    BetternetAnalyzed by CSIRO as bundling numerous ad trackers, monetizing user privacy.Caution

    The lesson is not “just these three,” but that a widely downloaded free app is no guarantee of trustworthiness. Install counts and high store ratings say nothing about how your data is actually handled.

    What do the studies say about free VPNs?

    The figures below come from independent analyses relayed by the specialist press. They vary by sample and year, but they all point the same way.

    • Around 20% of the free Android VPN apps tested were flagged as potentially harmful by antivirus tools, according to a 100-app analysis relayed by Top10VPN.
    • More than 60% of free VPNs on iOS and Android reportedly raise privacy concerns, based on research cited by CNET.
    • A large share of the most popular free Android VPNs leak data through IPv4, IPv6, DNS or WebRTC according to several independent studies.
    • A Zimperium zLabs analysis of over 800 free VPN apps found that hundreds offered no real encryption despite their claims.
    • The academic CSIRO study of hundreds of Android VPN apps showed that, among those most likely to contain malware, the majority were free.

    To keep in perspective

    These percentages mostly cover the mobile Android ecosystem and all free VPNs, fake free ones included. They do not condemn the rare, serious free tiers from reputable providers, which we cover next.

    Are there any genuinely safe free VPNs?

    Yes, but the list is short. The only trustworthy free offers are the limited versions of reputable paid providers, funded by their subscribers and subject to the same audits as the full plans.

    #1Proton VPN FreeBased in Switzerland, unlimited data, no ads, open source, audited no-logs. The benchmark for a serious free tier.Trusted
    #2WindscribeLimited but generous monthly data, built-in ad blocker, same encryption as the paid plan.Trusted
    #3TunnelBearOnly 2 GB per month, but audited every year and transparent. Great for a quick fix.Trusted

    These free tiers use the same strong encryption (AES-256 or ChaCha20) as their paid versions, they simply cap data, servers or speeds to nudge you toward a subscription. That is a healthy model. We break them down in our dedicated pick of the best free VPN within the VPN hub.

    The honest trade-off

    Even with these trustworthy free tiers, expect very real limits: capped monthly data, fewer server locations, streaming often blocked and sometimes throttled speeds. Free will get you out of a bind, it does not replace a full plan.

    How can you spot a dangerous free VPN?

    Before installing any free app, these red flags rule out most of the traps.

    • No paid plan behind it. If the provider sells nothing, ask yourself how it makes money. The answer is rarely reassuring.
    • A vague or missing privacy policy. A serious service spells out exactly what it does and does not collect, ideally backed by an independent audit.
    • Unlimited data and features with no catch. A real free tier has to fund its servers, so it caps something. “Everything unlimited and free” usually hides a data-driven model.
    • An opaque provider or risky jurisdiction. No identifiable company, headquarters in a country with weak data protection: all red flags.
    • Excessive permissions. On mobile, be wary of a VPN that asks for access to contacts, SMS or fine location without a reason.
    • Aggressive in-app ads. A flood of pop-ups often signals an intrusive ad model, sometimes paired with tracking.
    A VPN whose business model you do not understand is a VPN you should not trust with your traffic.The MiisterSoftware team, on choosing a free VPN.

    Quick quiz

    What is the main way a fake free VPN makes money?

    So, should you avoid free VPNs?

    The honest answer is nuanced. An unknown fake free VPN, downloaded at random from a store, should be avoided without hesitation: the risk of data collection, malware or leaks far outweighs the benefit, to the point where it can be worse than using no VPN at all. On the other hand, a free tier from a reputable provider (Proton VPN Free above all) remains a legitimate choice for occasional, non-sensitive use.

    For regular use, streaming, remote work or protecting sensitive data, a paid subscription stays the rational choice: a few euros a month buy you solid encryption, an audited no-logs policy, fast servers and real support. That is exactly what we compare in our ranking.

    Ready to choose with confidence?

    We compared the encryption, protocols, speeds and logging policies of the best offers around.

    See the 2026 comparison →

    The next step

    Now that you know the dangers, see our comparison of the best VPNs of 2026, or browse everything on the topic in our VPN hub.

    Frequently asked questions

    Are free VPNs dangerous?

    Most unknown “100% free” VPNs are, yes. Since users do not pay with money, they often pay with data: collecting and reselling history, injecting ads, sometimes malware or DNS leaks. Independent analyses have found roughly a fifth of the free Android apps tested flagged as risky. The only trustworthy exceptions are the limited free tiers of reputable paid providers like Proton VPN.

    Why is a free VPN never really free?

    Because running a server network costs millions per year. If the provider does not sell a subscription, it makes money another way, usually by collecting and reselling your browsing data or injecting ads. The only healthy model is freemium: a paying subscriber funds the limited free version.

    What is the safest free VPN?

    Proton VPN Free is the most recommended: based in Switzerland, unlimited data, no ads, open source and audited no-logs. Windscribe and TunnelBear are other trustworthy options, with limited monthly data but the same encryption as their paid plans. These are limited versions of serious providers, not fake free VPNs.

    Can a free VPN steal my banking details?

    A malicious free VPN that applies no real encryption, or that bundles malware, can expose your traffic, including sensitive information. The HTTPS on banking sites adds protection, but handing your traffic to an opaque service is still a risk to avoid. For that kind of use, prefer a paid VPN with audited encryption.

    Is a free VPN better than no VPN at all?

    It depends on the VPN. An unknown fake free VPN can be worse than no VPN, because it concentrates your traffic in the hands of a shady operator who may resell it. A free tier from a reputable provider, by contrast, offers genuine protection for occasional use. For regular use, a paid subscription remains the safest choice.

  • Employee Retention Strategies for 2026 · Miister Software

    People & culture

    Employee retention strategies: how do you keep your best people in 2026?

    MCThe Miister Software team Updated July 2026 9 min read
    Turnover costs real money Career paths keep people Managers drive retention Act on the data
    Cover image (WEBP, SEO alt “employee retention strategies 2026”)

    TL;DR, the essentials

    • Employee retention is your ability to keep people in the business over time, so you lose fewer of them to resignations and avoid the cost of replacing them.
    • The strategies that consistently move the needle are fair pay, clear career paths, good managers, flexibility, recognition and a sense of belonging.
    • In 2026, the best approach is proactive and data-informed: spot the warning signs early through surveys and stay interviews, then act before people leave.
    • Figures here are indicative industry patterns, not benchmarks for your specific company. Measure your own turnover to know where you stand.

    Losing a good employee is expensive, disruptive and often avoidable. Replacing someone costs money in hiring and lost productivity, and drains the morale of the team left behind. The good news: retention is not luck, it is the sum of decisions you can influence. This guide breaks down what employee retention really means, why it matters more than ever in 2026, and seven practical strategies you can put in place, whether you run a five-person team or a growing company.

    What is employee retention?

    Employee retention is the extent to which an organisation keeps its people over a given period, rather than losing them to voluntary departures. It is usually the flip side of turnover: high retention means low turnover, and vice versa. A useful way to think about it is in three layers.

    1

    Keeping people at all

    The baseline: reducing the number of employees who choose to leave, especially in their first year.

    2

    Keeping the right people

    Retention is most valuable when it holds on to your high performers and hard-to-replace skills, not just headcount.

    3

    Keeping people engaged

    Someone can stay and be disengaged. Real retention means people who want to be there and do their best work.

    It is worth separating voluntary departures (someone resigns) from involuntary ones (redundancy, dismissal). Retention strategy focuses mostly on the voluntary kind, because those are the leavers you had a genuine chance to keep.

    Worth knowing

    Not all turnover is bad. A healthy business will always see some people move on, and a little fresh talent is good for the mix. The goal is not zero turnover, it is keeping the people you most want to keep and cutting avoidable, regretted losses.

    Why does retention matter so much in 2026?

    Retention has become a board-level concern for a simple reason: turnover is costly. Recruiting, onboarding and getting a replacement up to full productivity takes time and money, and while the seat is empty or half-filled, the rest of the team absorbs the extra load. Estimates of replacement cost vary widely by role and seniority, but the direction is never in doubt: it is far cheaper to keep a good employee than to replace one.

    Beyond the direct cost, there is a compounding effect. When one person leaves, colleagues often reassess their own situation, and a single departure can trigger others. Strong retention protects three things at once:

    • Knowledge: experienced people carry context and relationships that walk out the door with them.
    • Momentum: stable teams ship faster than teams constantly onboarding replacements.
    • Culture: people stay where they feel they belong, and that stability attracts the next hires too.

    Tracking turnover in a spreadsheet?

    Our roundup ranks the best HR software of 2026, which surfaces retention data, surveys and one-to-one records in one place.

    See the comparison →

    What are the 7 retention strategies that actually work?

    There is no single silver bullet. Retention is built from several reinforcing habits. These seven come up again and again in the evidence, and none of them require a huge budget to start.

    1

    Pay fairly and transparently

    Pay does not have to be the highest, but it must be fair and competitive. Review salaries regularly against the market, and fix internal inequities before people find them out.

    2

    Offer a visible career path

    People stay when they can see a future where they are. Map out growth routes, fund training and promote from within when you can.

    3

    Invest in managers

    People often leave managers, not companies. Train team leads to give feedback, listen and support, because the direct manager is the single biggest lever on retention.

    4

    Give real flexibility

    Flexible hours and remote or hybrid options remain among the most valued benefits. Trust and autonomy over how work gets done go a long way.

    5

    Recognise good work

    Regular, specific recognition costs nothing and matters enormously. People who feel seen and appreciated are far more likely to stay.

    6

    Protect wellbeing

    Manage workloads to prevent burnout. Chronic overload is one of the fastest routes to resignation, whatever the pay.

    7

    Build belonging

    A sense of connection and inclusion keeps people committed. Foster genuine team bonds and a culture where people feel they fit.

    Rule of thumb

    If you can only start with one thing, start with managers. A capable, supportive line manager amplifies every other strategy on this list, from pay conversations to career growth to recognition.

    Quick quiz

    Which single factor tends to have the biggest impact on whether an employee stays?

    Why should retention be data-informed?

    The most effective retention work in 2026 is proactive, not reactive. Waiting until someone hands in their notice is too late. The pattern that separates strong employers is that they listen continuously and act on what they hear, rather than running one survey a year and filing the results.

    Three practical listening tools stand out:

    • Pulse surveys: short, frequent check-ins that track engagement and flag dips early.
    • Stay interviews: conversations with people who are staying, to learn what keeps them and what might tempt them away, long before an exit interview would.
    • Turnover analytics: looking for patterns by team, tenure or manager to find where the risk is concentrated.

    The point is to turn signals into action. If a team’s engagement score drops or one manager’s group keeps losing people, that is a prompt to intervene, not a number to note. This is where HR software earns its place, by making the data easy to collect and read.

    Retention is not a poster on the wall, it is a series of small, consistent actions: a fair pay review, a good one-to-one, a career conversation. Do them well and people rarely go looking elsewhere.The Miister Software team, HR basics.

    Does retention start before day one?

    Yes. Retention begins at hiring and in the first weeks on the job. A candidate given an honest picture of the role is less likely to leave disappointed, and a strong first impression sets the tone for the whole relationship. Early departures, in the first year, are often the most preventable and the most expensive relative to the short time worked.

    A structured start, clear expectations, an assigned buddy and early wins all reduce first-year attrition. Getting the beginning right pays back for years, because the habits and impressions formed in the first ninety days are hard to reverse later.

    A common mistake

    Many companies pour effort into hiring and then go quiet once the person starts. That gap is where early leavers are made. Treat the first ninety days as part of your retention strategy, not just an admin task.

    Automate surveys and one-to-ones

    See the HR platforms that run pulse surveys, track engagement and centralise employee records so you spot risk early.

    Our 2026 pick →

    How do you measure employee retention?

    You cannot improve what you do not measure. The two headline numbers are the retention rate and the turnover rate, which mirror each other. A simple way to express retention over a period is the share of employees present at the start who are still there at the end.

    • Retention rate: of the people employed at the start of the year, the percentage still employed at the end.
    • Turnover rate: leavers over the period divided by the average headcount, expressed as a percentage.
    • Regretted vs non-regretted: split leavers into those you wanted to keep and those you did not, so the number tells you something useful.

    Track these over time and by segment (team, tenure, manager, role). A single company-wide figure hides more than it reveals; the value is in the trend and the breakdown. Good HR software calculates these automatically and lets you see them at a glance.

    Not a universal benchmark

    Healthy turnover varies enormously by industry, role and country. A rate that is high in one sector is normal in another. Compare yourself against your own trend and your industry, not a generic target.

    Next step

    Ready to put the data behind your retention plan? See our best HR software of 2026 comparison, or head back to the HR & Payroll hub to see how HRIS and engagement tools fit together.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the difference between retention and turnover?

    They are two sides of the same coin. Retention measures the share of employees you keep over a period, while turnover measures the share who leave. High retention means low turnover. Retention strategy focuses mainly on voluntary departures, the leavers you had a real chance to keep.

    Which retention strategy has the biggest impact?

    No single strategy works alone, but the quality of the direct manager consistently stands out. People often leave managers rather than companies, so training team leads to give feedback, listen and support amplifies every other lever, from fair pay to career growth and recognition.

    How do you calculate a retention rate?

    A simple method is to take the employees present at the start of a period and work out the percentage still employed at the end. Turnover is the mirror image: leavers divided by average headcount. Track both over time and by team, tenure and manager rather than as a single company-wide figure.

    Does retention start before an employee’s first day?

    Yes. It begins at hiring and in the first weeks on the job. An honest picture of the role, a structured start, clear expectations and early wins all cut first-year attrition, which is often the most preventable and the most costly relative to the short time worked.

    What is a stay interview?

    A stay interview is a conversation with an employee who is staying, to understand what keeps them and what might tempt them to leave. Unlike an exit interview, it happens early enough to act on. It is one of the most useful proactive tools for spotting retention risk before someone resigns.

  • First Response Time vs Resolution Time: 2026 Guide

    Learn

    First response time vs resolution time: what is the difference?

    MCThe MiisterSoftware team Updated July 2026 9 min read
    First response time (FRT) Resolution time Benchmarks by channel 6 levers to cut them
    Cover image (WEBP, SEO alt “first response time vs resolution time”)

    TL;DR, the essentials

    • First response time (FRT) measures the gap between a request arriving and an agent’s first meaningful reply. It is the most visible metric for the customer.
    • Resolution time measures the total time until the request is closed. It reflects whether the problem was actually fixed.
    • Both are simple to compute: total time divided by the number of requests, ideally in business hours.
    • The 2026 benchmarks swing widely by channel: seconds in live chat, hours in email.
    • A help desk software measures these delays automatically, alerts before a breach and helps reduce them for good.

    “How long does our support team take to reply?” Behind that simple question sit two different metrics, first response time and resolution time, which are often confused and do not measure the same thing. One captures how fast you acknowledge a request, the other how long it takes to fix the problem. Here is what each one covers, how to calculate them, the 2026 benchmarks by channel and six concrete levers to bring them down.

    What is customer service response time?

    “Response time” is a shortcut that, in most customer service teams, points to two complementary measures. The first is the speed of acknowledgement: how quickly an agent picks up a request. The second is the speed of resolution: how long it takes to fully close that request. Mixing the two leads to misunderstandings, because a team can reply in thirty seconds yet take three days to resolve.

    In one sentence

    First response time measures reactivity, resolution time measures effectiveness. Both matter, but you do not run them the same way.

    These two delays sit at the heart of customer service KPIs and underpin the contractual commitments formalized in an SLA. Understanding them is a prerequisite before setting any quantified target.

    What is first response time (FRT)?

    First response time, often shortened to FRT, measures the gap between the moment a request arrives and the moment an agent provides the first useful reply. This means a genuine, relevant human response, not an automatic acknowledgement of the “we have received your message” kind.

    It is the most visible metric for the customer, because it shapes the first impression. A quick reply sends a clear signal, “we have seen you, we are on it”, and builds trust before the problem is even solved. A prolonged silence, by contrast, fuels worry and follow-up messages that in turn overload the team.

    Good habit

    Do not count auto-replies in your FRT. An acknowledgement reassures, but it distorts the measure: what matters is the first genuinely human, relevant response.

    What is resolution time?

    Resolution time measures the total delay between a request arriving and its closure, once the problem is actually fixed. Where first response time captures reactivity, resolution time captures the outcome: did the customer get what they needed, and how long did it take?

    This delay is almost always tied to the request’s priority. A blocking outage and a minor billing question do not share the same target. It also splits into raw, calendar resolution time and business-hours resolution time, which excludes nights and weekends. The second version best reflects the team’s real performance.

    A neighbouring notion completes the picture, first contact resolution (FCR), which measures the share of requests solved in the first exchange, with no back-and-forth. A high FCR mechanically pulls resolution time down and lifts satisfaction.

    Running a support team?

    Our roundup ranks the best help desk software of 2026 on delay tracking and SLA management.

    See the comparison →

    Should you aim for response or resolution?

    The question comes up constantly, and the honest answer is: both, in that order. The 2026 studies on customer expectations put speed of response at the top of the criteria for a good support experience, slightly ahead of speed of resolution and well ahead of channel availability (Zendesk data cited by industry benchmarks, indicative, July 2026). In other words, a customer forgives a slow resolution more easily than an initial silence.

    Yet the underlying trend adds nuance: instant resolution is gradually becoming the leading metric. Replying fast is no longer enough if the problem drags on. The winning combination is therefore a fast first response, then a complete resolution, ideally on the first contact.

    First response time opens the relationship, resolution time closes it. Optimising one without the other produces an unbalanced support team.

    Quick quiz

    What does first response time measure?

    How do you calculate these delays?

    Both formulas are simple and are computed over a given period, a week or a month for instance.

    • Average first response time: sum of the first response delays across all requests, divided by the number of requests handled.
    • Average resolution time: sum of the resolution delays across all closed requests, divided by the number of closed requests.

    A classic trap waits here: the average hides the outliers. A handful of requests forgotten for several days can drag the average down even when 95% of requests get a reply within ten minutes. To avoid this bias, also track the 90th percentile, which shows the delay below which nine requests out of ten sit. It often reveals the real points of friction.

    Watch out

    Always state whether your delays run in calendar hours or business hours, and whether the clock pauses when the ball is in the customer’s court. Without that rule, two teams reporting “4 hours” are not measuring the same thing.

    What are the 2026 benchmarks by channel?

    Customer expectations depend heavily on the channel used. A delay judged excellent on email would be disastrous on live chat. Here are the benchmarks seen in the 2026 studies (indicative values, July 2026, adjust to your own industry).

    • Live chat: top teams aim for a first response under 40 seconds. Satisfaction peaks around 85% when the first reply arrives within 5 to 10 seconds.
    • Email: the target for high-performing teams is a first response under 4 hours, while the cross-industry average sits closer to 7 to 12 hours.
    • Social media: the best teams reply in under an hour, whereas customers tolerate up to a day.
    • Phone: reactivity here is measured in seconds of wait before pickup, with a common target under 30 seconds.

    On the resolution side, benchmarks vary with complexity: a few hours for a simple chat request, one business day for a standard email, and shorter targets, in the range of a few hours, for critical incidents governed by an SLA.

    Live chat : seconds · Email : hours · Social media : under an hour
    The 2026 first response benchmarks vary by a factor of a thousand depending on the channel the customer chooses.

    How do you reduce your response times?

    Bringing FRT and resolution time down for good depends on organisation as much as tooling. Six levers show up consistently among high-performing teams.

    1

    Route requests automatically

    Assigning by topic and priority removes manual triage, the main source of latency before a first reply.

    2

    Equip agents with canned replies

    Response templates and a knowledge base speed up a quality first reply without starting from scratch.

    3

    Deflect with self-service

    A well-kept FAQ and help centre solve simple requests before they ever enter the queue.

    4

    Set SLA alerts

    Real-time reminders before a breach keep a request from sleeping at the bottom of the queue.

    5

    Track the 90th percentile

    Chasing outliers, not just the average, reveals and fixes the real friction points.

    6

    Aim for first contact resolution

    Every avoided back-and-forth shortens resolution time and lifts satisfaction.

    How does support software measure these delays?

    Tracking first response time and resolution time by hand in a spreadsheet becomes unworkable as soon as a team handles any volume. That is exactly what a ticketing system or a full help desk manages: it timestamps every step of a request, from the first message to closure, and computes the delays automatically.

    In practice, the tool starts a countdown as soon as a request arrives, pauses the clock when the ticket is waiting on the requester, shows the time remaining and alerts before an SLA breach. A dashboard then aggregates the average delays, the percentiles and the first contact resolution rate, which makes performance measurable week after week.

    On budget, this delay and SLA tracking is usually included in the mid-tier plans of support software, billed per agent per month, with the most advanced rules reserved for higher plans, sometimes on a custom quote for large organisations.

    Delays you can keep also mean the right tool

    Our selection compares the support software that measures FRT, resolution time and automates alerts.

    Our 2026 selection →

    The next step

    Looking for a tool that measures and reduces these delays natively? Read our comparison of the best help desk software of 2026, or explore all our resources on running a support team.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the difference between response time and resolution time?

    First response time measures the delay before an agent’s first human reply, reflecting reactivity. Resolution time measures the total time until the request is closed, reflecting effectiveness. The two are complementary and are not run the same way.

    How do you calculate first response time?

    Add up the first response delays of all requests over a period, then divide by the number of requests handled. Exclude automatic acknowledgements and state whether the calculation runs in calendar hours or business hours.

    What is a good first response time in 2026?

    It depends on the channel. On live chat, top teams reply in under 40 seconds. On email, the high-performing target is under 4 hours, against an industry average of 7 to 12 hours. On social media, a reply within an hour is considered fast (indicative values, July 2026).

    Should you prioritise speed of response or resolution?

    Both, in that order. Customers often rank speed of response at the top of their expectations, but instant resolution is becoming the reference metric. The ideal is a fast first response followed by a complete resolution, if possible on the first contact.

    Why track the 90th percentile and not just the average?

    The average hides outliers: a few forgotten requests can drag the metric down even when most get a fast reply. The 90th percentile shows the delay below which nine requests out of ten sit and reveals the real friction points to fix.

    Does a help desk software measure these delays automatically?

    Yes. Support software timestamps every step of a request, computes first response time and resolution time, pauses the clock when the ticket is waiting on the customer and alerts before an SLA breach. A dashboard then aggregates these measures to run performance.